Two-sided Platform User Research 0→1 Wireframing

Execit — Executive
Mentoring Platform

From a blank slate to an investor-ready prototype — solo, end-to-end, in under 3 months. A two-sided marketplace built on 10 real interviews and one central insight about trust.

My Role
Solo Designer
Duration
~10 weeks
Organisation
IVI, Maynooth University
Output
Greyscale prototype for pitch deck

A direction, not a blueprint.

Execit came to IVI with an idea: a platform where experienced executives could offer fractional mentoring to early-stage startups and SMEs who need senior expertise but can't afford a full-time hire. There were no wireframes, no validated features, and no defined user journey — just a two-sided market opportunity and a lot of open questions.

The competitive landscape made the opportunity clear. Platforms like Upwork and Fiverr skew toward junior and mid-level roles. Mentorship platforms like MentorCruise and ADPList lack execution accountability. Enterprise Ireland provides government-backed mentorship but offers no commercial structure. Execit had a real gap to fill — but only if the platform understood both sides deeply.

My job was to answer the open questions through research before touching any design tool. No assumptions, no shortcuts.

Execit platform overview
Platform overview — key screens showing the overall concept

Ten interviews. Two sides. One central problem.

Two-sided platforms fail when you design for one side. Before building anything, I needed to understand the motivations, fears, and workflows of both executives and the startups hiring them. I ran 10 structured interviews — 5 executives with fractional or consultancy experience, and 5 SME founders and growth-phase operators.

I transcribed every interview, used AI to surface initial themes, then reviewed each theme against my own reading of the transcripts — adjusting where patterns felt oversimplified or missed the emotional texture of what people were actually saying.

Finding 01

Trust is the real barrier — on both sides. Executives were reluctant to work with the wrong clients. Vague briefs, missed payments, and reputational risk were recurring fears.

Finding 02

SMEs don't know what they need. Founders knew they needed senior help but didn't know how to scope it. The brief creation problem was as significant as the matching problem.

Finding 03

Both sides want structure, not just a marketplace. Execit's differentiation was the scaffolding: contracts, milestones, payment protection — not just matching.

Finding 04

Referrals beat discovery. Executives trust referrals over job boards. Social proof mechanisms needed to be built in from day one.

"You have to be careful about who you work with. There's a lot of noise out there. I prefer referrals, not job boards."

— Executive interviewee

"You need the right resource, but your requirements have to be incredibly detailed. If you're loose, you end up in a bad place."

— SME founder interviewee

Four personas. Two markets.

The research consolidated into four distinct personas — two on each side of the marketplace. Each had different motivations, different fears, and different definitions of success.

The Mission-Driven Mentor
Executive · Side A

Purpose over pay. Wants cultural fit and meaningful impact. Needs reassurance that the client is serious and prepared before committing.

The Portfolio Operator
Executive · Side A

Stability plus flexibility. Runs 2–3 fractional roles simultaneously. Wants clear scope, clean contracts, and reliable payments above all else.

The Early-Stage Builder
Founder · Side B

Pre-revenue, resource-constrained. Needs hand-holding through scoping. Risk-averse — needs strong trust signals before committing to any spend.

The Growth-Phase Founder
Founder · Side B

Post-funding, scaling fast. Values speed of matching and executive credibility. Willing to pay for quality if the signal is strong enough.

Research synthesis and persona documentation
Research synthesis — affinity mapping and persona documentation

Five red routes that do the real work.

From the research, I identified the five critical journeys Execit needed to nail before anything else — the backbone of the IA and wireframe scope.

1
Guided Brief → Statement of Work
A structured brief creation flow helping founders scope their need, with KPIs and milestones auto-generated as a starting point for the SoW.
2
Milestone Delivery → Dual Sign-off → Automated Payment
The accountability loop that differentiates Execit. Both parties sign off before payment is released — protecting both sides simultaneously.
3
Curated Shortlist → Fast Intro Call
2–4 curated executive matches — not an open browse — reducing noise and respecting executive time. Quality over volume.
4
Payment Protection
Escrow and deposit structure protecting both sides. Executives know they'll be paid; founders know their money is only released on delivery.
5
Lean Admin
Instant digital contracts, onboarding checklists, and milestone tracking — making the engagement feel professional from day one.

Two journeys. One cohesive system.

The wireframes covered the two primary first-time user journeys. Both converge on the Statement of Work as the shared contract anchoring the engagement.

💡

Executive journey: Receive curated opportunity → review brief with vetting signals → review SoW terms → accept or decline → schedule intro call → finalise SoW.

💡

Client journey: Sign up → create guided brief → review auto-generated SoW → receive curated matches → book intro call → select executive → finalise SoW.

Executive journey wireframes
Executive journey wireframes — from curated opportunity to SoW sign-off
Client journey wireframes
Client journey wireframes — from guided brief to executive selection

From research to pitch deck.

The prototype was delivered and used by Execit in their investor pitch deck and for early testing with prospective users on both sides of the platform. A Phase 2 — visual design and technical scoping — is under consideration pending further funding.

The AI-assisted synthesis worked well for speed but occasionally flattened emotional nuance. In retrospect, I'd run a quick affinity mapping session with the founders mid-synthesis to pressure-test the themes before they hardened into persona definitions.

I'd also push earlier for Execit to define their monetisation model clearly — earlier clarity would have sharpened the payment flow wireframes significantly.

← Back to all work Next case study Equitek →